Wheat Sheaves For A Wedding

Clarin reported what he wants Time to come clean

First of all I want to recover the phone to hear a phrase on Channel 7: " When reporters think that criticizing the media's criticism of freedom of expression, it is because these are created only owners of this freedom. " is a paradox, freedom of expression, unlike the press, is limiting itself to these gentlemen. be not enough opposition to tell the truth. And because press freedom is not free enterprise .

Clarín That tool is not new, it is an oligopoly that brings together media either.

But what brings us today, is the interference of March 25, its satellites, where these opinions are fragile generators drilled all day about their problems in their satellites, just as he tabled the new Media Law, which replaces the law of the dictatorship. We

hints banks the government, but perhaps when the group criticized the government, attacks on freedom of expression?, And in the opposite case is only somewhat informative. They are the ones who set the limits of press freedom. The dictatorship of the media. Many think that there is opposition TV channels, yes, almost self-declared, but are not as traditional and ideologically complicit, not agglutinate the amount of media such as Clarin.

Among the things we had to keep quiet:

There PRESS ATTACK intentional interference to Channel 13, NT and Radio Mitre lasted for three hours on Tuesday and two hours yesterday. It was detected that is made from somewhere in South America, on the Intelsat IS-3R satellite that relays signals dozens. But the attack affected only the companies of Grupo Clarin. Source .

... But we come to find out about this:

solution
INTELSAT satellite WOULD HAVE LOCATED Source of interference to art. For blues lovers of conspiracies, the company's researchers believe that the satellite signal failure Artear have been caused by a technical test conducted by an American operator. Source

Of course, this is not going to report. Of course I liked the statement style of Al Qaeda Descamisados \u200b\u200b JP. But as they return back so much disinformation?. That disinformation masked in fairness (not C5N), which only reports the consequences of the marches in transit, and not the reason for the protest (there are those who want to work and those who interrupt the traffic, in other words information that has work-until you stop having-), or echoes insecurity only when it ac ertainly sector of society (the kids there appear to move the rest of the country, outside the province of Buenos Aires, there is uncertainty or Formosa or in its suburbs, or Earth Salta fire or that beautiful country!) with the same reason as reported epidemics (when they come down the center of the country and may affect the consuming public Clarín).

Inform the strikes, but as they affect customers, report the eviction, but in terms of violence, these people dripping blood, and yellow. For example, it did not see any of your media: SOURCE . IN ONE YEAR HAS DOUBLED THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE SLEEPING IN THE STREETS PORTEÑAS. The silent war evictions. In a year during which the city government implemented its policy of "silent evictions, the number of homeless in the city of Buenos Aires spent 1000 to 1950 and there are 22 000 people in eviction.

This is permanent. Not to mention if it was not De Narvaez who was in those communications for Nextel, and had been a minister Government, would be with a mobile, 24 at the door of courts (not to mention if it was Guillermo Moreno, a feast is made). Will critircar if they close the borders to Mexican flights, will be criticized if they open for not taking action (at the time of disease isolated us in the world), if candidetea Nacha Guevara criticized, not for Roy and Irma Pinki ( I will not refer to the daubs of Moria and Zulma). But it's all a paradigm than an informative report monopopolio is the process of the Media Law.

Related Sources: What's wrong Clarín

It's important to these people, you just want free enterprise, not news. That the most power or money you have is the report, otherwise it would be a gag. Will also continue to proclaim that criticize the reporting is a severe attack on freedom of expression. Because they think they own the fact and opinion because "the longer they have." It will be over.