Capital Debate . 2009 elections. Beyond discuss what we mentioned on Clarín, believed to own the democratic debate through their pale faces (Bonelli, that is not chechu, and Sylvester, the cat), it is necessary to analyze observed in the debate which requires candidates as undecided consumer choice in a gondola. That failed, they failed, which happened .- Michetti, The Gaby: was the spot, started and if you did zapping, was the same as advertising . With dialogue, work, etc.. He could not justify the project of a City Shopping. Bland, like a good candidate missing, they put him, debating things discussed for decades. As warmer face the face of the liberal right privatizing Buenos Aires, discussed and tabled banality. probably goes hand in hand with the participation of national Pro, or a limited vision of the country. It was a vision as simple and devoid of the problems of the capital, which could have easily done a debate alone with the soft Prat Gay. He could not defend the capital management, debt with the highest budget, broken promises (urbanization of villages, hospitals, subway, south, the 54 brothels?), Not to mention their partners duhaldista in the province are responsible for insecurity and structural deterioration. Macri let alone defending privatization few days ago. His ideas for addressing problems are the same that led to these problems. Warm solutions to structural problems. Open-pit mining (in the camera will have to vote), the structure of poverty, infant mortality, etc.. These are issues that are not on the agenda due to lack of understanding. Centralization could not defend the sale of supplies for the hospitals or the veto of the law of nationalization and manufacture of generic drugs (which are obviously things that are not very aware).
Prat Gay, Alfonsito: warm, warm ... cold. The same was not up to Heller alone in a debate that has no answers to questioning Pino on its turn to the IMF demands , liberal banker with the Washington Consensus doctrine of well-learned during his stay, gave touch her immaturity. Simple solutions such as income citizen children, among many patches, to avoid patronage rather than structural reform. No country model, or a model undeclared reduced criticism of layoffs and problems that are tied to a capitalist crisis and a model against which the government is fighting. Simplistic figures interpreted in the light, regardless of prior growth much greater than the number of layoffs. We all wonder how many people have lost their jobs with these people in government, supporting this crisis, cool growth without job creation and sustainable blank, no permanent social spending. Complaint that is in the countries mentioned as a model, and occur in a dire times. Complaint taxes, the easiest way to get to uncertain, yet the most difcícil to hold to fulfill promises and distribute income. Anyway, so there is no complaint, and on top, the better (pensions, wages, dignity). Impresentable before a debate, is the gimmick the old that seems divine, sweet and quiet. Fearful. Green is very green.
Fernando "Pino" Solanas: went further. On another level, and almost no hits came. Heller argued He and ideologies, country model, but of course, understood that they will be members of the nation, representing the locals, but nationally. This means that the deputies represent the people and solve problems from Ushuaia to Quiaca. As if you do not see the macabre plan reached all-against-K Heller, joined the grupejo , being functional to the right of the last (Gaby and PGay) and making sure what he wanted, hitting the government votes, and so certain to win the debate. Surely he did not want to discuss state ownership, security, etc. He went further: resources of the state, allegations of looting the public property, nationalize the port to the PDVSA national (YPF in our case). Let things that are obviously too small for the other 2 candidates, and that the increased insecurity in this country is born (for infant mortality) and traffic accidents, to which Heller said he is poverty. Concerned about yelling at Heller, to sweep the debate, getting applause from the studio, Pino recognizes nothing or very little. This militant Peronist popular filmmaker who greatly appreciated ranks in which the left can move, ie: hitting a progressive government, national and popular in search anti-K vote in the port city becomes noticeable. Pino did not recognize those things that recognized the principle the suit was finally opponent. It looks good, though it feels like a traitor.
Heller, Carlos: Against the tide. No doubt with Pino, Heller has the thing clearer and better speech. Here in TN not help much. His speech was to discuss alone with Pino , clear winners of the debate. But as we said, let him Pino Solanas . Heller comes from another place, is a cooperative, who joined the project that had been talking about it from your other party (PSOL), and put on the cloak and dagger. But he ran into a debate joined to hit because nobody recognizes campaigning nothing special, unless it is functional. The attack was the ideal goal of Gaby and Alfonso to avoid projects and proposals, to disengage from the debate of ideas and models. It was clear to every attack, defending a model for all who want to perfect what is lacking, as when it clarified that there was an better bill covering more the problems of strip mining that criticizes both Solanas, and is already in the Senate this project, what surprised Michetti said that it seems very correct. Heller was consistent, has an answer to all criticisms are partial and misinterpreted (which are the famous news media.) Prat Gay is a snack for Heller, no match, not a coincidence that never put them together to discuss. Heller deschava always the dark past of all, with protection of journalistic sources, budgets printed and published reports, Pino more measured but also to engage the candidate K. That past that the media do not mention. Heller knows his basic similarities with Pino are bigger, but not waited for the onslaught of Project South candidate in those differences. She lost. He was in the debate to tell the truth, and had to be restricted to resist barare were heard.
Conclusions. This debate is arbitrary, which were only candidates who are high in the polls, as usual, broke with others of the opportunity to discuss ideas and even to win. was concluded that the Gaby, and propose solutions worthy Prat Gay High School, to elucidate problems in television. And aimed at a local level and administrative. What Heller extends to the country, a project of all, we need to improve. And pine to natural resources, valid but functional. I would like the Pine ideas are at the head of Heller (which I think they are), but are not reasons to oppose all the good things this government has achieved. Solanas went right off and no scratches , dislodging the other 2 candidates from the liberal right, since long ago been fighting for issues not on the agenda for them and difficult to understand for the Pro and ACYS . Result: The motto is, "If you're left and you want the vote of the middle class Buenos Aires, hit the government" , but paste and left . Pino moved, pure and sincere, without masks, realistic and deep, but it fails to do is convince us to forget the achievements of this government, we have memory. Health Pino. electoral democracy. It is good to add and clarify that this system of division of power in Argentina, is certainly paradoxical. Although they have distinct functions, there are 2 powers are in practice closely linked: The Executive and Legislative: quietly could be subdivided block. Elections: The executive is elected through the vote (or as we say peers, popular vote), the legislature and the judiciary also no. Curiously, the share ballot elections with the executive, clearly pointed out in 2007. Its participants move from one to another constantly, which does not happen often in court. In theory the laws are linked to justice, enforcement, shelter, security, but clearly with the executive in his, forgive the repetition, execution. This close relationship, co-governance promoted by many, where the losers of the elections should govern executive from the legislature, it creates confusion. New people, ideas old, and because old ideas, old people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment